|
November 26, 2001 Issue
What Incentive Pay Plans Work Best
to Enhance Customer Service?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2001, the Institute of Management and Administration,
Inc. (IOMA) conducted a survey of operation directors, vice
presidents, service managers, office managers, and national
managers of customer service divisions around the country.
The survey's focus was to determine which incentive pay
formats work best to reinforce employee behavior in the
delivery of customer service. The following is a summary of
the survey results presented in IOMA's Pay for Performance
Report (http://www.ioma.com). The survey covers a
representative sample of 110 organizations encompassing a
cross section of industries around the country.
The survey found the vast majority of organizations focus
their base pay levels on the market. Adjustments to base are
primarily based on market fluctuations and local supply and
demand issues. There was little mention of linking base pay
adjustments to either individual or group performance.
Approximately two-thirds of respondents utilize the same
form of incentive compensation as the basis for either group
or individual recognition.
Respondents were asked to list, from their perspective,
the most and least successful incentive programs in terms of
reinforcing a customer service focus by employees.
Most Successful
- Sales Incentives
- Annual Bonus Program
- One-Time Spot Awards
- Gainsharing
- Quarterly Bonus
- Customer Compliment / Feedback Program
- Monthly Incentives
- Team-Based Incentives
- Profit Sharing
- Project Focused Incentives
Least Successful
- Annual Bonus Program
- Profit Sharing
- Team-Based Incentives
- Monthly Incentives
- Customer Compliment / Feedback Program
- Stock Based Programs
- Quarterly Incentives
- One-Time Spot Awards
- Individual Based Incentives
- Sales Incentives
Annual bonus programs had the distinction of being both
the second most effective program and the least effective
program in the survey. This is a clear indication that the
success of incentive programs is measured based on
organization culture and initial needs. Survey participants
were then asked how effective their incentive programs are
in reinforcing customer service behaviors. The top ten
programs were reviewed in terms of Highly Effective,
Moderately Effective, and Not at All Effective.
Program |
Highly Effective |
Moderately Effective |
Not at All Effective |
Sales Incentives |
48% |
48% |
4% |
Monthly Incentives |
47% |
41% |
12% |
One-Time Spot |
42% |
55% |
3% |
Team-Based Incentives |
42% |
25% |
33% |
Gainsharing |
40% |
40% |
20% |
Customer Compliments |
39% |
54% |
7% |
Project Based |
27% |
64% |
9% |
Profit Sharing |
26% |
58% |
16% |
Annual Bonus |
24% |
58% |
16% |
Quarterly Incentives |
24% |
59% |
18% |
The following are comments from survey respondents
regarding these incentive programs and their effectiveness.
Sales Incentives:
Why They Work: "Sales incentives are most successful because
they are based on individual performance. More money, a lot
of involvement and fun with customers."
Why They Don't Work: "Those involved in customer services do
not have complete control over the ultimate outcome (sale)
of the interaction. Sales are a team effort."
Annual Bonus Programs:
Why They Work: "The program is not based on personality or
skills. Each person sets goals with their supervisor so
there is assurance that the goal is attainable. The goals
are upfront and each employee clearly understands what is
required to achieve the goal."
Why They Don't Work: "Bonuses seem to be expected regardless
of performance. Goals are often set too high and
unattainable. Payment of bonus is often contingent upon the
overall financial success of the company and not individual
performance so it becomes a negative."
One-Time Spot Awards:
Why They Work: "Makes employees proud and leads them to want
it again. Employees feel they are recognized for actions
just taken."
Why They Don't Work: "They are contingent on feedback from
customers which is not always available or forthcoming."
Gainsharing:
Why They Work: "Employees come up with ideas to save dollars
for the company. If achieved, a year-end bonus is paid."
Why They Don't Work: "Employees get frustrated when they
make recommendations that management and senior management
doesn't act upon thus losing interest in the program."
Quarterly Bonuses:
Why They Work: "Gives the employee a positive attitude
toward the company and their jobs. They can see the result
of their efforts in a short period of time. Do not have to
wait a whole year to gauge and reward for results. But does
require consistent performance beyond one time."
Why They Don't Work: "High risk to the organization if there
is a payout for one quarter but the remaining quarters do
not meet their targets."
Astron consultants advocate the use of self-funded "goal
sharing" programs in incentive programs impacting employees.
The self-funded aspect ensures the protection of the
organization's resources. The group involved must determine
a way to fund the incentives without negatively impacting
the organization's current financial targets.
In customer service focus areas, the first challenge is to
determine the value of customer service or satisfaction and
to translate this value into tangible dollars. Often
organizations find this difficult because customer service
is viewed as a long-term, rather than short-term, impact.
The ability to fund the program also becomes the "team"
reward aspect of the program.
The second challenge is to determine the behaviors or
outcomes, outside of the financial benefits, the
organization is attempting to enhance. These become the
measures of individual effort. Using the "balanced
scorecard" theory of success measurement, these measures
should focus on quality improvement, growth / process
improvement, financial improvement, and / or customer
improvement. Take a historical review of your organization's
successes and failures. Determine in what areas employees
can have an influence and improve.
Once determined, a matrix can be established that links
group goal achievement (funding) with individual
contribution. Quarterly based incentives are most effective
in allowing quick recognition and reward while allowing the
organization time to alter targets during the current fiscal
year.
Wonder what your fellow readers think about critical HR topics? Is your organization unique from or similar to others?
Click here to view the results of our past polls!
If you have a topic you would like addressed in Astronology, or some feedback on a past article, don't hesitate to tell us! Simply reply to this e-mail. See your question answered, or comments addressed, in an upcoming issue of Astronology.
Looking for a top-notch presenter for your human resource organization's meeting? Both Jennifer Loftus and Michael Maciekowich present highly-rated sessions on a variety of compensation and employee retention issues. For more information, send an e-mail to
info@astronsolutions.com.
Are you reading a pass-along copy of Astronology? Click on
this button
to start your own subscription today!
Send inquiries to
info@astronsolutions.com or call 800-520-3889, x105.
We hold your e-mail address in trust. Astron Solutions promises never to share or rent your personal information. We also promise never to send you frivolous e-mails and will allow you to leave our list, at your option, at any time.
To remove yourself from this list, please follow your personalized subscriber link at the bottom of your Astronology alert e-mail.
Copyright 2007, Astron Solutions, LLC
ISSN Number 1549-0467
|
|