|
August 5,
2002 Issue
What Are the Impacts of In-House
Temporary Employee Pools?
Although the
economy appears to be unsettled with unemployment moving
towards the 6% mark, there is an increasing reliance on
temporary employees to meet production and service needs. In
2000, staffing companies on an average day employed over 2.5
million temporary workers. In 2001, the figure grew to over
three million. When you add the number of "freelance"
employees in the market today, this number swells to just
over five million.
In the past, when a recession or signs of one were apparent,
temporary staff use declined. In the first two quarters of
2002, the opposite occurred. Organizations are eliminating
regular positions and replacing these with in-house
temporary or pool staff. This model allows the organization
to have staff available as needed, eliminate middlemen, and
reduce the overall cost of utilizing these employees. In
healthcare, for example, a temporary agency Registered Nurse
may cost up to $60 per hour. The cost of an in-house pool RN
can be as little as $30 per hour, a substantial savings.
In 2002, U.S. industries spent $90 billion on temporary
staff. It is estimated that in 2002 this number will top
$100 billion (Staffing Industry Analysts). Between 2000 and
2001, the use of temporary staff increased 3.6%. It is
estimated usage will increase 14% in 2002. Healthcare usage
will increase by more than 25%, the highest of any industry
group.
In response to this growing need, a new type of employee has
emerged. Business Week calls them the "Just-in-Time
Employee." In the latter half of the 20th century, power
flowed to big corporations, where employees were replaced
like light bulbs. With the 21st century economic model
transitioning to a knowledge-based economy, the balance of
power shifts to those with needed skills.
The talent needed for the future will remain scarce. At the
same time, many industries believe it is better to have
fluid, nimble workforces that grow or shrink according to
market demands. This reality has created "day-trades" in the
employment game. It is estimated that over 30% of the
resumes found on web exchanges such as Monster.com are from
employees who are not necessarily looking for a particular
position, but want to keep their options open.
Free agency has many benefits. The constant influx of new
projects or assignments keeps work interesting. Lifestyle
perks, such as control of time off, are a primary draw to
the world of temporary employment.
Many human resource professionals view this new free agent
employee as the enemy. In fact, there is often a false sense
of security when human resource professionals look at their
current, regular employees. According to the Department of
Labor, a typical 32 year old already will have had nine jobs
and may have as many as twenty jobs in their lifetime.
According to Bruce Tuglan (Winning the Talent Wars),
organizations have to adopt a revolving-door mentality in
which former "turncoats" are viewed as "alumni" who are
welcomed back in any capacity.
More progressive organizations have seen the signs of the
future and have developed an alternative to temporary agency
usage by creating their own in-house pool. Like an agency,
pool staff are not considered regular employees. They are
not eligible for any benefits and are restricted to limited
hours throughout the calendar year. They are paid much more
than regular full-time employees but much less than the fees
charged by temporary agencies. In-house pools allow the
organization to retain "alumni" who left regular employment
due to work-life conflict issues or opted for the
"just-in-time" approach to be available to others on an as
needed basis.
The impact on the organization of this movement to in-house
pool staff is dictated by how the program is developed,
administered, and communicated. The following are some of
the key issues with this program:
- Internal jealousy of regular staff is a primary
concern. They made a commitment to work regular hours
and be available to the organization. They see
freelancers as less than loyal and having little
interest in the organization.
- There is a concern, especially in the service
industry, that lack of continuity harms the
organization's efforts to provide high quality,
consistent services. With rotating staff, there is a
high risk of granting assignments to those who are not
interested in the organization's mission.
- There is a high probability that freelancers also
are working for competitors. While one can take every
precaution to protect confidential information, free
movement of employees makes this more and more
difficult.
- Using in-house pool staff often is detrimental to
any efforts to create a cohesive team among the staff.
The freelance pool person knows they can leave at will
and do not have to participate in team activities. If
forced to, they can easily leave the pool.
- Of large concern is controlling movement between the
temporary pool and regular employment. When a regular
employee wants to move to the pool, many organizations
grant the request believing that keeping the employee in
the pool is better than losing them completely. But what
happens when they want to move back to regular status.
Can such movement occur? What about legal issues in
terms of pension, benefits, time-off, etc.? What happens
to morale if you allow or restrict such moves?
All indications are there will not be enough workers to meet
the needs of the next forty years. Employees with needed
skills know this and are ready to offer their services to
the highest bidder. While flexibility, availability, and
reduced cost are appealing, an organization's focus must
remain on internal implications of pool usage. Be sure to
utilize the following:
- Restrict movement from pool to regular employment to
at most once a calendar year. Those who leave the
regular ranks should know they have made a decision
lasting at least twelve months.
- Require pool employees to know the mission, vision,
and customer service standards of the organization and
to be held accountable for them when current assignments
are reviewed or future assignments are available.
- For those organizations with trade secret concerns,
require pool employees to sign non-compete and
confidentiality statements.
In-house pools will remain a popular alternative to agencies
in the quest for temporary help. The next few years will see
their growing use. As with all innovative human resource
programs, care must be taken to understand all implications
on current employee morale.
Wonder what your fellow readers think about critical HR topics? Is your organization unique from or similar to others?
Click here to view the results of our past polls!
If you have a topic you would like addressed in Astronology, or some feedback on a past article, don't hesitate to tell us! Simply reply to this e-mail. See your question answered, or comments addressed, in an upcoming issue of Astronology.
Looking for a top-notch presenter for your human resource organization's meeting? Both Jennifer Loftus and Michael Maciekowich present highly-rated sessions on a variety of compensation and employee retention issues. For more information, send an e-mail to
info@astronsolutions.com.
Are you reading a pass-along copy of Astronology? Click on
this button
to start your own subscription today!
Send inquiries to
info@astronsolutions.com or call 800-520-3889, x105.
We hold your e-mail address in trust. Astron Solutions promises never to share or rent your personal information. We also promise never to send you frivolous e-mails and will allow you to leave our list, at your option, at any time.
To remove yourself from this list, please follow your personalized subscriber link at the bottom of your Astronology alert e-mail.
Copyright 2007, Astron Solutions, LLC
ISSN Number 1549-0467
|
|