|
November
24, 2003
Happy Thanksgiving!
All of us at
Astron Solutions wish you a Happy Thanksgiving!
Enjoy the day and the tasty meal. Don't forget to give
thanks for all that's important in your life - family,
friends, a job, a warm and safe home.
We're thankful you're a part of our family!
The Astron Road
Show
If you
are going to be in New York City on December 4, you have two
opportunities to meet with the Astron Solutions team!
Jennifer Loftus, National Director, will present to the
Business Council of New York State's Labor and HR Committee.
Jennifer will speak on current trends in compensation. To
learn more about the meeting, contact Janet Carroll at
518-465-7511 x217.
Also on December 4, Gabriel Squailia, Astron's Research
Librarian, will make his trade show debut! Gabriel will be
meeting and greeting attendees at the AHHRA annual full-day
conference. AHHRA is the New York City chapter of ASHHRA.
Jennifer will also be at the conference, so be sure to stop
by and say hello!
Call for Presentations
Would
you like a copy of Jennifer's December 4th presentation?
How about a copy of "Workforce Culture: New Orleans Style,"
presented by National Director Michael Maciekowich on
November 13th at the Metropolitan Hospital Council of New
Orleans' full-day conference?
To receive copies of either or both of these presentations,
click here to
contact Gabriel Squailia.
Are My Non-Exempt
Positions Still Non-Exempt? Proposed FLSA Changes You Need
to Know
In
March of 2003, the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour
Division proposed extensive changes to the long-outdated
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). While the current
standards' confusing overtime exemption test is hardly
beloved in the HR community, the prospect of far-reaching
changes has caused some trepidation. In this
Astronology, we
offer insight into the proposed changes and an update on the
legal battle surrounding this issue.
The
proposed changes
comprise nearly forty pages of revisions and updates. Here
are some highlights, with an emphasis on major differences
in criteria and tests for determining exempt / non-exempt
status.
- Employees earning less
than $425 per week, or $22,100 per year, would
automatically be non-exempt (eligible for overtime). The
current standard is $155 per week, significantly less
than the federal
minimum wage.
- The "short" and "long"
exemption tests would be abolished, in favor of a
"standard duties test" providing criteria for each
exemption category.
- Employees earning
between $22,100 and $65,000 per year would be considered
exempt if they perform the duties summarized in one of
the employee categories below:
- Executive:
- Manage the
enterprise, or a department / subdivision
thereof.
- Manage two or
more employees.
- Hire, fire, or
advise on such status changes.
- Administrative:
- Perform
non-manual work related to management or general
business of the employer or its customers.
- Hold a
"position of responsibility," performing "work
of substantial importance or requiring a high
level of skill or training."
- Learned
professional: Perform non-manual work requiring
advanced learning. Technical training, on-the-job
experience, and other means of acquiring knowledge
would be recognized, as well as traditional higher
education.
- Employees earning more
than $65,000 per year and performing one of the
executive, administrative, or professional duties
described above would be automatically exempt.
- The test of "discretion
and independent judgment" would be eliminated, and
replaced in the administrative test with the
aforementioned "position of responsibility" criterion.
- Exempt employees could
receive disciplinary suspensions, with pay docking, for
periods of one day or more.
Once the proposed changes were released, the battle lines
were quickly drawn. In the broadest terms, business groups
and Republicans in Congress are for the changes (though
often with suggested modifications), while unions and
Democrats have sided against them. Strong opinions and
wildly varying predictions have made this a dizzying debate.
The nonpartisan Economic Policy Institute claims that the
changes would cause up to eight million workers to lose
their overtime qualifications. The nonpartisan Employment
Policy Foundation, on the other hand, claims that the
proposed changes would extend non-exempt status to 3.4
million workers, and that none would lose overtime rights.
The Department of Labor claims that the regulations would
add 1.3 million workers to the non-exempt category. The DOL
agrees that some workers would lose their non-exempt status,
but cites the number at 644,000.
To further complicate matters, the Senate recently passed an
amendment, sponsored by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), which
would deny Labor Department funding for regulations that
would cause any non-exempt employees to be reclassified as
exempt. The Harkin amendment is attached to a wider
appropriations bill, which President Bush has threatened to
veto if it is passed with the Harkin amendment intact.
On November 18, the AFL-CIO issued a letter stating that "[t]he
purpose of the Harkin amendment is not to stop DOL from
updating or clarifying the overtime eligibility rules, but
rather to establish common sense ground rules for DOL's
rulemaking."
According to the Daily Labor Report on November 19, House
Appropriations Committee Chairman C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla)
said the DOL proposal has postponed a conference report for
weeks. "That is a show-stopper," said Young. "Somebody with
jurisdiction has to make a decision [on handling the Harkin
amendment.]"
Many labor organizations are claiming that the proposed
changes will automatically change the FLSA status of
registered nurse from non-exempt to exempt, thus depriving
nurses their overtime pay. While the proposed guidelines
would lead to this conclusion, the market has and will
continue to be the primary influence in paying registered
nurses overtime. In fact, under the current regulations it
is possible to exempt registered nurses, but because of
market conditions and labor shortages hospitals have chosen
to track hours and pay overtime, a key in determining FLSA
status. The same can be said for many other professions.
Be sure to keep an eye on the news for the conclusion to
this saga, which may yet have far-reaching implications for
the HR profession.
Wonder what your fellow readers think about critical HR topics? Is your organization unique from or similar to others?
Click here to view the results of our past polls!
If you have a topic you would like addressed in Astronology, or some feedback on a past article, don't hesitate to tell us! Simply reply to this e-mail. See your question answered, or comments addressed, in an upcoming issue of Astronology.
Looking for a top-notch presenter for your human resource organization's meeting? Both Jennifer Loftus and Michael Maciekowich present highly-rated sessions on a variety of compensation and employee retention issues. For more information, send an e-mail to
info@astronsolutions.com.
Are you reading a pass-along copy of Astronology? Click on
this button
to start your own subscription today!
Send inquiries to
info@astronsolutions.com or call 800-520-3889, x105.
We hold your e-mail address in trust. Astron Solutions promises never to share or rent your personal information. We also promise never to send you frivolous e-mails and will allow you to leave our list, at your option, at any time.
To remove yourself from this list, please follow your personalized subscriber link at the bottom of your Astronology alert e-mail.
Copyright 2007, Astron Solutions, LLC
ISSN Number 1549-0467
|
|